Mapping predicted biomass in cereal rye using 3D imaging and geostatistics

Abstract

Abstract Cover crops are becoming an increasingly important tool for weed suppression. Biomass production in cover crops is one of the most important predictors of weed suppressive ability. A significant challenge for growers is that cover crop growth can be patchy within fields, making biomass estimation difficult. This study tested ground-based structure-from-motion (SfM) for estimating and mapping cereal rye (Secale cereale L.) biomass. SfM generated 3D point clouds from red, green, and blue (RGB) videos collected by a handheld GoPro camera over five fields in North Carolina during the 2022 to 2023 winter season. A model for predicting biomass was generated by relating measured biomass at termination using a density–height index (DH) from point cloud pixel density multiplied by crop height. Overall biomass ranged from 320 to 9,200 kg ha−1, and crop height ranged from 10 to 120 cm. Measured biomass at termination was linearly related to DH (r2 = 0.813) through levels of 9,000 kg ha−1. Based on independent data validation, predicted biomass and measured biomass were linearly related (r2 = 0.713). In the field maps generated by kriging, measured biomass data were autocorrelated at a range of 5.4 to 42.2 m, and predicted biomass data were autocorrelated at a range of 3.4 to 12.0 m. However, the spatial arrangement of high- and low-performing areas was similar for predicted and measured biomass, particularly in fields with greatest patchiness and spatial correlation in biomass values. This study provides proof-of-concept that ground-based SfM can potentially be used to nondestructively estimate and map cover crop biomass production and identify low-performing areas at higher risk for weed pressure and escapes.

Plant phenotyping relevance

地上型SfMによる3D画像から、イネ科被覆作物のバイオマスを推定・検証・マッピングする手法が研究の中心であり、植物形質の非破壊取得を扱うため含める。

Code and data availability

The article describes SfM videos, ground-truth biomass data, and Python SfM scripts, but contains no public deposit, repository, or availability statement for any dataset, imagery, or code. The Python scripts were created by an acknowledged collaborator with no public URL, so no paper-specific public asset qualifies.

No evidence-backed public reproduction asset is currently recorded.