Multi-Platform LiDAR Comparative Assessment for Aboveground Biomass and Carbon Estimation in Mediterranean Woody Crops

Abstract

Reliable aboveground biomass (AGB) estimates for woody crops are essential for carbon accounting and for Measurement, Reporting and Verification (MRV) frameworks. However, it remains unclear how LiDAR modality and sampling geometry influence plot-scale and tree-scale AGB predictions in intensively managed Mediterranean orchards. In this study, we benchmarked four LiDAR modalities, namely open national airborne laser scanning from the Spanish National Aerial Orthophotography Plan (PNOA/ALS), a dedicated Riegl airborne laser scanner (ALS), unmanned laser scanning (ULS) and mobile laser scanning (MLS), across three woody-crop sites in Córdoba (southern Spain): IFAPA, Doña María, and Villaseca. Plot-level LiDAR metrics (mean height, 95th height percentile, maximum height, and canopy-cover proxies) were extracted from normalized point clouds and related to field AGB using Random Forest and XGBoost regression models, together with an ensemble predictor, under an 80/20 train–test split. In parallel, TreeQSM-based Quantitative Structure Models (QSMs) were evaluated as an independent tree-level three-dimensional reconstruction approach. XGBoost achieved the lowest errors at IFAPA (RMSE = 0.400 Mg ha−1; R2 = 0.994) and Villaseca (RMSE = 0.872 Mg ha−1; R2 = 0.995), whereas PNOA/ALS was competitive at Doña María (RMSE = 0.725 Mg ha−1; R2 = 0.994). TreeQSM closely matched the field inventory at the low-biomass IFAPA site but tended to overestimate biomass at Doña María and Villaseca, and only 28% of scanned trees yielded usable reconstructions. The results support the use of cross-platform LiDAR for orchard AGB and carbon mapping and identify the conditions under which open national LiDAR can enable scalable MRV of Mediterranean woody crops.

Plant phenotyping relevance

LiDAR複数プラットフォームと3D再構成を比較・検証し、樹木・区画レベルの地上部バイオマスという植物形質を推定する手法が研究の中心である。

Code and data availability

The supplied blocks describe field inventory, LiDAR acquisitions, and ML/QSM analysis but contain no public phenotype dataset, point cloud, image, code, or model deposit with an authors' URL. A 'project data repository' is mentioned but no public link or deposit language is given.

No evidence-backed public reproduction asset is currently recorded.