Individual Tree-Scale Aboveground Biomass Estimation of Woody Vegetation in a Semi-Arid Savanna Using 3D Data

Abstract

Allometric equations are the most common way of assessing Aboveground biomass (AGB) but few exist for savanna ecosystems. The need for the accurate estimation of AGB has triggered an increase in the amount of research towards the 3D quantification of tree architecture through Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS). Quantitative Structure Models (QSMs) of trees have been described as the most accurate way. However, the accuracy of using QSMs has yet to be established for the savanna. We implemented a non-destructive method based on TLS and QSMs. Leaf-off multi scan TLS point clouds were acquired in 2015 in Kruger National Park, South Africa using a Riegl VZ1000. The 3D data covered 80.8 ha with an average point density of 315.3 points/m2. Individual tree segmentation was applied using the comparative shortest-path algorithm, resulting in 1000 trees. As 31 trees failed to be reconstructed, we reconstructed optimized QSMs for 969 trees and the computed tree volume was converted to AGB using a wood density of 0.9. The TLS-derived AGB was compared with AGB from three allometric equations. The best modelling results had an RMSE of 348.75 kg (mean = 416.4 kg) and a Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) of 0.91. Optimized QSMs and model repetition gave robust estimates as given by the low coefficient of variation (CoV = 19.9% to 27.5%). The limitations of allometric equations can be addressed by the application of QSMs on high-density TLS data. Our study shows that the AGB of savanna vegetation can be modelled using QSMs and TLS point clouds. The results of this study are key in understanding savanna ecology, given its complex and dynamic nature.

Plant phenotyping relevance

TLSとQSMを用いて個体樹木の構造から地上部バイオマスを推定する測定手法を実装し、複数のアロメトリ式と精度比較・再現性評価を行っており、植物形質取得法が研究の中心である。

Code and data availability

The paper's TLS point clouds, tree segmentation outputs, and QSM-derived AGB measurements are paper-specific phenotyping data, but the authors state they are only available on request and not publicly accessible. The supplementary workbook contains only allometric parameter-error analysis, not the phenotyping data or作者

No evidence-backed public reproduction asset is currently recorded.