Comparative Assessment of Hyperspectral Image Segmentation Algorithms for Fruit Defect Detection Under Different Illumination Conditions.

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of hyperspectral image segmentation algorithms for fruit defect detection under different illumination conditions. The research evaluates the performance of four segmentation methods (Spectral Angle Mapper, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and Neural Network) using three distinct illumination modes (local, simultaneous and sequential). The experimental setup employed hyperspectral imaging to assess tomato fruit samples, with data acquisition performed across the 450-850 nm spectral range. Quantitative metrics, including accuracy, error rate, precision, recall, F1-score, and Intersection over Union (IoU), were used to evaluate algorithm performance. Key findings indicate that Random Forest demonstrated superior performance across most metrics, particularly under simultaneous illumination conditions. The highest accuracy was achieved by Random Forest under sequential illumination (0.9971), while the best combination of segmentation metrics was obtained under simultaneous illumination, with an F1-score of 0.8996 and an IoU of 0.8176. The Neural Network showed competitive results. The Spectral Angle Mapper proved sensitive to illumination variations but excelled in specific scenarios requiring minimal memory usage. By demonstrating that acquisition protocol optimization can substantially improve segmentation performance, our results support the development of accurate, non-contact, high-throughput inspection systems and contribute to reducing postharvest losses and improving supply chain quality control.

Plant phenotyping relevance

トマト果実の欠陥という植物状態を対象に、ハイパースペクトル画像セグメンテーション手法を比較・評価し、照明条件と取得プロトコルの最適化を検証しているため、方法が中心的である。

Code and data availability

The paper's hyperspectral tomato datasets, annotations, and MATLAB analysis code are not publicly deposited; the Data Availability Statement says experimental data is available only from the corresponding author upon reasonable request, so no public paper-specific asset exists.

No evidence-backed public reproduction asset is currently recorded.