Robustness of high-throughput prediction of leaf ecophysiological traits using near infra-red spectroscopy and poro-fluorometry

Abstract

ABSTRACT Water scarcity is a major threat to crop production and quality. Improving drought tolerance through variety selection requires a deeper understanding of plant ecophysiological responses, but large-scale phenotyping remains a bottleneck. This study assessed the potential of high-throughput tools (spectroscopy and poro-fluorometry) to predict leaf morphological and ecophysiological traits in a grapevine diversity panel grown in pots under well-watered outdoor conditions and under three contrasting soil water treatments in a greenhouse. We found a certain complementarity between measuring devices. Spectrometers could accurately predict leaf mass per area, water content, and water quantity (R² > 0.58), while the poro-fluorometer was efficient for predicting net CO₂ assimilation (R² > 0.72), regardless of the water treatment. The prediction of leaf mass per area using spectrometers appeared to be quite robust across both outdoor and greenhouse experiments, while the prediction of water use efficiency was dependent on the water treatment, with much better predictions under moderate (R² > 0.73) than severe water deficit. Calibrated models were then applied to the full diversity panel using only high-throughput measurements to estimate trait values and their broad-sense heritability. Leaf mass per area, also measured directly, showed similar heritability whether based on observed or predicted data. Heritability estimates for predicted traits reached up to 0.5. Overall, our findings support the use of spectroscopy and poro-fluorometry as reliable, non-destructive tools for high-throughput phenotyping, enabling genetic studies on drought-related traits in grapevine.

Plant phenotyping relevance

分光法とポロフルオロメトリーによる葉の形態・生理形質の高スループット推定を開発・評価し、予測精度と頑健性を検証しているため、植物フェノタイピング手法が中心である。

Code and data availability

The supplied blocks contain only binary/compressed PDF stream data with no readable text, no data or code availability statements, and no URLs. No paper-specific public phenotyping datasets, images, code, or models can be identified.

No evidence-backed public reproduction asset is currently recorded.