Unverified paper record
Comparison of Isotope Mass Balance and AquaCrop Model in Evapotranspiration Partitioning in a Maize Field of North China.
Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2 Jul 2026 · 10.3390/plants15132059
Abstract
Understanding evapotranspiration (ET) partitioning into soil evaporation (E) and plant transpiration (T) is crucial for improving agricultural water use efficiency in water-scarce regions. The isotope mass balance (IMB) method and AquaCrop model are two widely used approaches for ET partitioning, yet their comparative performance across different crop growth stages remains poorly characterized. This study systematically compared these two methods using two consecutive years (2012-2013) of field isotopic observations in a summer maize field on the North China Plain, a core maize production area facing severe agricultural water scarcity. Stable isotope analysis showed that the local meteoric water line (LMWL) had a slope lower than the global meteoric water line. The 0-5 cm surface soil water evaporation lines had slopes of 5.84 (2012) and 8.06 (2013), confirming significant evaporative enrichment in the topsoil. Plant water isotopic composition closely resembled that of 40-100 cm deep soil water, indicating limited root uptake from the surface layer. IMB-estimated transpiration ratio (T/ET) exhibited distinct phenological patterns, increasing from 37 to 44% at jointing to a peak of 94-96% at filling, then declining to 84-85% at maturity. The two methods agreed well during filling to maturity (differences of 2-10%), but compared with the IMB method, AquaCrop substantially underestimated T/ET at jointing (0.9% vs. 43.8% in 2013) due to its canopy-cover-based transpiration algorithm. These findings identify the filling stage as the critical water demand period, providing a quantitative reference for precision irrigation management under similar climate and soil conditions.
Plant phenotyping relevance
トウモロコシの蒸散比を対象に、同位体質量収支法とAquaCropモデルを比較・検証しており、植物の水利用状態を取得する測定手法の性能評価が中心である。
abstractThe isotope mass balance (IMB) method and AquaCrop model are two widely used approaches for ET partitioning, yet their comparative performance across different crop growth stages remains poorly characterized.
abstractThe two methods agreed well during filling to maturity (differences of 2-10%), but compared with the IMB method, AquaCrop substantially underestimated T/ET at jointing
Code and data availability
植物フェノタイピング解析を再現する公開資産であることを、入力本文と直接リンクから確認できなかったため保留しました。
No evidence-backed public reproduction asset is currently recorded.
This is an automatically classified, unverified record. Curator approval is required before any resource enters the Catalog.