SciELO Preprints - Este documento é um preprint e sua situação atual está disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.15500 573 The raw data, processed data, and R analysis code are publicly available on GitHub: 574 https://github.com/labevofern/Microgramma-Outline.git. 575 576 REFERENCES 577 Ackerly D.D. (2004) Adaptation, Niche Conservatism, and Convergence: Comparative 578 Studies of Leaf Evolution in the California Chaparral. The American Naturalist, 163, 654– 579 671. 580 Adams D.C., Collyer M.L. (2018) Multivariate Phylogenetic Comparative Methods: 581 Evaluations, Comparisons, and Reco
Open resource ↗labevofern/Microgramma-Outline · Microgramma-Outline · pdf-layout-page:25 lines:1-48Unverified paper record
A multidimensional view of fronds reveals phenotypic structuring and delimitation problems
20 Mar 2026 · 10.1590/scielopreprints.15500
Abstract
Recognizing lineages is a central challenge in plant systematics, making it essential to explore multiple analytical tools. In this context, this study investigates how frond shape can assist in discriminating against lineages within the Scaly clade of Microgramma (Polypodiaceae), and tests whether the integration of multiple lines of evidence enables a more consistent recognition of lineages than exclusively macromorphological approaches. We analyzed 271 specimens representing eight species, using Elliptical Fourier Analysis (EFA) to quantify frond shape, followed by multivariate statistical tests (PCA, MANOVA, LDA). Evolutionary relationships between spectral and morphometric data were assessed through phylogenetic generalized least squares (PGLS) regressions and phylogenetic partial least squares (Phylo-PLS) analyses. Dimorphic species exhibited higher discrimination capacity (average accuracy of 80–83%). Fertile and combined fronds yielded the highest accuracy values. Morphologically similar species, such as M. reptans and M. tobagensis, showed significant overlap, whereas M. percussa achieved the best performance (average accuracy of 80%). Morphometric-spectral integration showed a strong correlation (R² = 0.72; P = 0.003), and both the combined datasets (spectra and outline) and the individual datasets of spectral and shape features revealed a high phylogenetic signal (λ = 1–0.84), indicating partial coevolution between frond shape, chemical composition, and the evolutionary history of the group. Outline morphometry combined with infrared spectroscopy within a phylogenetic framework improves lineage discrimination, although overlap zones persist, reflecting complex evolutionary processes. Our study highlights the potential of integrative systematics to elucidate species boundaries in groups with high morphological disparity, as well as the need for broad sampling and multi-evidence approaches in future systematic reviews.
Plant phenotyping relevance
フロンド形状をElliptical Fourier Analysisで定量化し、赤外分光との統合を用いて系統識別性能を評価しており、植物器官形質の取得・解析手法が研究の中心です。
abstractusing Elliptical Fourier Analysis (EFA) to quantify frond shape, followed by multivariate statistical tests (PCA, MANOVA, LDA).
abstractOutline morphometry combined with infrared spectroscopy within a phylogenetic framework improves lineage discrimination
Code and data availability
The authors state that raw data, processed data, and R analysis code for the frond outline morphometrics are publicly available on GitHub (Microgramma-Outline), and the FT-NIR spectral data repository (Microgramma-FTNIR) is referenced in the methods. Both are paper-specific, public, and actionable.
biting the highest 157 perpendicular distance from the line connecting the first and last bands in the R² × ranking 158 plot (Fig. S2). Following the methods described in Mendonça et al. (2026), spectral data were 159 acquired using a PerkinElmer Frontier™ near-infrared Fourier transform spectrometer (FT- 160 NIR) available at (https://github.com/labevofern/Microgramma-FTNIR). 161 Phylogenetic comparative analyses 162 To provide a phylogenetic framework for comparative morphometric and spectral analyses, 163 we used the pruned version of the Microgramma chloroplast phylogenetic inference from 164 Mendonça et al. (2026). This tree was based on the Bayesian phylogenetic tree published by 165 A
Open resource ↗labevofern/Microgramma-FTNIR · Microgramma-FTNIR · pdf-layout-page:8 lines:1-55This is an automatically classified, unverified record. Curator approval is required before any resource enters the Catalog.