ne represents perfect agreement between estimated values and actual values. (TIF) Acknowledgments We would like to thank all involved in the AOD survey days and the National Trust and Royal Parks for allowing workshops to take place on their properties. Data Availability The code and data used for this paper are available from: https://github.com/MCombess/Plant_Health_sens_spec_workflow and are archived: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15730414 . Funding Statement MC, NB, PC, SP undertook the work with funding from the United Kingdom’s Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs ( https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/department-for-environment-food-rural-affairs ) through the Futu
Open resource ↗Plant_Health_sens_spec_workflow · lines:244-268Unverified paper record
Unlocking plant health survey data: An approach to quantify the sensitivity and specificity of visual inspections.
PLoS computational biology · 20 Nov 2025 · 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012957
Abstract
Invasive plant pests and pathogens cause substantial environmental and economic damage. Visual inspection remains a central tenet of plant health surveys, but its sensitivity (probability of correctly identifying the presence of a pest) and specificity (probability of correctly identifying the absence of a pest) are not routinely quantified. As knowing sensitivity and specificity of visual inspection is critical for effective contingency planning and outbreak management, we address this deficiency using empirical data and statistical analyses. Twenty-three citizen scientist surveyors assessed up to 175 labelled oak trees for three symptoms of acute oak decline. The same trees were also assessed by an expert who has monitored these individual trees annually for over a decade. The sensitivity and specificity of surveyors was calculated using the expert data as the 'gold-standard' (i.e., assuming perfect sensitivity and specificity). The utility of an approach using Bayesian modelling to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of visual inspection in the absence of a rarely available 'gold-standard' dataset was then examined with simulated plant health survey datasets. There was large variation in sensitivity and specificity between surveyors and between different symptoms, although the sensitivity of detecting a symptom was positively related to the frequency of the symptom on a tree. By leveraging surveyor observations of two symptoms from a minimum of 80 trees on two sites, with reliable prior knowledge of sites with a higher (~0.6) and lower (~0.3) true disease prevalence we show that sensitivity and specificity can be estimated without 'gold-standard' data using Bayesian modelling. We highlight that sensitivity and specificity will depend on the symptoms of a pest or disease, the individual surveyor, and the survey protocol. This has consequences for how surveys are designed to detect and monitor outbreaks, as well as the interpretation of survey data that is used to inform outbreak management.
Plant phenotyping relevance
植物の病徴を対象とする目視検査の感度・特異度を定量化し、ゴールドスタンダードなしで推定するベイズモデルを検討しており、植物病害状態の取得・評価法が研究の中心である。
abstractVisual inspection remains a central tenet of plant health surveys, but its sensitivity (probability of correctly identifying the presence of a pest) and specificity (probability of correctly identifying the absence of a pest) are not routinely quantified.
abstractThe utility of an approach using Bayesian modelling to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of visual inspection in the absence of a rarely available 'gold-standard' dataset was then examined with simulated plant health survey datasets.
Code and data availability
The paper's Data Availability statement explicitly provides the code and data used for the study (plant health survey sensitivity/specificity analysis) via a public GitHub repository and an archived Zenodo DOI, both listed in allowed_urls.
IF) Acknowledgments We would like to thank all involved in the AOD survey days and the National Trust and Royal Parks for allowing workshops to take place on their properties. Data Availability The code and data used for this paper are available from: https://github.com/MCombess/Plant_Health_sens_spec_workflow and are archived: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15730414 . Funding Statement MC, NB, PC, SP undertook the work with funding from the United Kingdom’s Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs ( https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/department-for-environment-food-rural-affairs ) through the Future Proofing Plant Health Programme (Project Reference: TH42222FR09: citizen s
Open resource ↗10.5281/zenodo.15730414 · lines:244-268This is an automatically classified, unverified record. Curator approval is required before any resource enters the Catalog.