Datasets are supplied in the Supplementary Materials and at https://agdatacommons.nal.usda.gov/articles/dataset/Data_from_Visualizing_Plant_Responses_Novel_Insights_Possible_through_Affordable_Imaging_Techniques_in_the_Greenhouse/26527447 , accessed on 13 August 2024; images are available upon request.
Open resource ↗agdatacommons.nal.usda.gov · 26527447 · lines:97-173Unverified paper record
Visualizing Plant Responses: Novel Insights Possible Through Affordable Imaging Techniques in the Greenhouse
Sensors · 17 Oct 2024 · 10.3390/s24206676
Abstract
Efficient and affordable plant phenotyping methods are an essential response to global climatic pressures. This study demonstrates the continued potential of consumer-grade photography to capture plant phenotypic traits in turfgrass and derive new calculations. Yet the effects of image corrections on individual calculations are often unreported. Turfgrass lysimeters were photographed over 8 weeks using a custom lightbox and consumer-grade camera. Subsequent imagery was analyzed for area of cover, color metrics, and sensitivity to image corrections. Findings were compared to active spectral reflectance data and previously reported measurements of visual quality, productivity, and water use. Results confirm that Red–Green–Blue imagery effectively measures plant treatment effects. Notable correlations were observed for corrected imagery, including between yellow fractional area with human visual quality ratings (r = −0.89), dark green color index with clipping productivity (r = 0.61), and an index combination term with water use (r = −0.60). The calculation of green fractional area correlated with Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (r = 0.91), and its RED reflectance spectra (r = −0.87). A new chromatic ratio correlated with Normalized Difference Red-Edge index (r = 0.90) and its Red-Edge reflectance spectra (r = −0.74), while a new calculation correlated strongest to Near-Infrared (r = 0.90). Additionally, the combined index term significantly differentiated between the treatment effects of date, mowing height, deficit irrigation, and their interactions (p < 0.001). Sensitivity and statistical analyses of typical image file formats and corrections that included JPEG, TIFF, geometric lens distortion correction, and color correction were conducted. Findings highlight the need for more standardization in image corrections and to determine the biological relevance of the new image data calculations.
Plant phenotyping relevance
安価なカメラ画像から芝草の被覆・色などの形質を抽出し、画像補正の感度、他センサーおよび既存測定との相関を検証しており、植物表現型取得法が中心である。
abstractThis study demonstrates the continued potential of consumer-grade photography to capture plant phenotypic traits in turfgrass and derive new calculations.
abstractSubsequent imagery was analyzed for area of cover, color metrics, and sensitivity to image corrections.
abstractSensitivity and statistical analyses of typical image file formats and corrections that included JPEG, TIFF, geometric lens distortion correction, and color correction were conducted.
Code and data availability
The paper deposits its phenotype measurement datasets (raw data, ANOVA statistics, time series) both in MDPI Supplementary Materials and in a public AgDataCommons dataset. Plant images are only available upon request, and no author analysis code repository with a public URL is stated.
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/s24206676/s1 . Supplementary S1: F-values. Supplementary S2: p -values for experimental effects ANOVA ( Table 4 ), nine additional individual time series charts. Supplementary S3: of BA, %C, %G, DGCI, HSVi, NDRE, NIR, RED, and RE metrics. Supplementary S4: Additional discussion text. Supplementary S5: Raw data.
Open resource ↗lines:97-173This is an automatically classified, unverified record. Curator approval is required before any resource enters the Catalog.