Current methods and future needs for visible and non-visible detection of plant stress responses.

Abstract

As climate change alters the frequency, intensity, and co-occurrences of abiotic and biotic stresses, the effective and efficient detection of plant stress responses and resistance mechanisms is critical for safeguarding global food security. Stressful environments elicit both visible and non-visible changes in plants. Cellular and subcellular changes, often invisible to the naked eye, can serve as indicators of stress and can be quantified using molecular, ionomic, metabolomic, genomic, and transcriptomic methods. In contrast, visible responses such as discoloration, morphological changes, and disease symptoms can be monitored efficiently through atmospheric, aerial, and terrestrial remote sensing platforms. Phenotyping at the whole-plant and organ levels offers valuable insights for diagnosing stress in situ , providing opportunities to study plant resistance and acclimation strategies under realistic conditions. However, the complexity of plant stress responses, spanning microscopic to macroscopic scales and diverse biological processes, make it challenging for any single technology to comprehensively capture the full spectrum of reactions. Furthermore, the rising prevalence of multifactorial stress conditions highlights the need for research on synergistic and antagonistic interactions between stress factors. To effectively mitigate the impacts of stress on agriculture, future research must prioritize integrative multi-omic approaches that connect cellular and subcellular processes with morphological and phenological stress responses.

Plant phenotyping relevance

植物ストレス応答の可視・不可視検出手法と、全植物・器官レベルのフェノタイピングを扱う方法論的レビューであり、手法の整理が中心です。

Code and data availability

This is a review article on plant stress detection methods. The supplied blocks contain only citations to prior work, funding/conflict statements, and a pointer to supplementary material without any described phenotype datasets, images, code, or models of the paper itself. No paper-specific public asset is identified.

No evidence-backed public reproduction asset is currently recorded.