MC-SlotNet: Multiplicity-Consistent Slot-Based Full-Cell Instance Segmentation for Overlapping Plant Suspension-Culture Microscopy

Abstract

Overlapping cells in plant suspension-culture microscopy pose a particular challenge, for instance, segmentation because a single pixel may belong to more than one cell. Most standard instance-segmentation methods are not designed for this setting and tend to treat overlapping objects as mutually exclusive regions. We instead represent each cell as an independent full-cell instance and introduce MC-SlotNet, an architecture that separates competitive object-slot feature assignment from mask decoding. This allows multiple predicted masks to occupy the same image region. We further introduce a mask-level multiplicity-consistency loss that encourages the predicted number of masks covering a pixel to agree with the underlying cell occupancy. We evaluate MC-SlotNet on a newly annotated dataset of 53 Siraitia grosvenorii suspension-culture micrographs containing 4131 full-cell instances acquired at 4×–40× magnification. Using grouped five-fold cross-validation and an overlap-preserving evaluation protocol, we compare the method with Mask R-CNN, SOLOv2, and Mask2Former. MC-SlotNet achieves the best performance on AP50 (0.800), mAP50:95 (0.565), F150 (0.842), all-ground-truth Dice (0.761), AJI+ (0.754), overlap-region Dice (0.705), and overlap-instance recall (0.828). Its AP75 (0.649) is comparable to Mask2Former’s (0.651). MC-SlotNet also has the lowest inference time among the evaluated methods, at 1.113 s/image. These results indicate that decoding full-cell masks independently, rather than enforcing an exclusive partition of image pixels, is well-suited to instance segmentation in plant suspension-culture microscopy images with substantial cell overlap.

Plant phenotyping relevance

植物細胞の重複画像から個々の細胞を分割・抽出する新規モデルを開発し、データセット上で既存手法と比較評価しており、植物表現型取得法が研究の中心である。

Code and data availability

The paper's annotated microscopy dataset (53 images, 4131 instances) and training/inference code are explicitly not publicly released; access requires contacting the corresponding author. No public paper-specific asset exists.

No evidence-backed public reproduction asset is currently recorded.