Genomic prediction vs. gene-based crop models: a case study on rice trait prediction.

Abstract

Conventional breeding for ideotypes in target environments remains challenging due to genotype-by-environment interactions and the genetic complexity of key agronomic traits. Traditional multi-environment field trials are costly and time-consuming, limiting rapid genetic gain. These challenges highlight the need for digital tools to support rice breeding. However, two major approaches, genomic prediction (GP) and gene-based crop models (GBCMs), have distinct advantages. In this study, a dataset derived from a natural rice population comprising 210 genotypes, genotyped with about 650,000 markers, rice dry matter, and yield across three environments, was used to develop two genomic prediction models, genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and a convolutional neural network (CNN), together with a gene-based crop modeling framework. The effectiveness of these models in predicting rice traits and assisting in breeding selection was subsequently evaluated. Prediction results indicated that biomass and yield could be effectively predicted by all models, with Normalized Root Mean Square Error (NRMSE) values ranging from 10.60% to 18.59% and 9.93% to 18.19%, respectively. In terms of predictive accuracy, parameter-based crop models achieved the highest predictive accuracy, although it was confined to theoretical simulations. This was followed by the GBCM and CNN, whereas the GBLUP exhibited the lowest performance. Furthermore, GGE biplot analysis revealed the predictions of the GBCM aligned more closely with field observations than those of the CNN, emphasizing the potential of GBCM as a practical surrogate for digital breeding. These results provide valuable insights into modeling genotype-by-environment interactions and support the development of data-informed breeding strategies for future rice improvement.

Plant phenotyping relevance

イネの乾物量・収量という植物形質を予測する複数の計算モデルを開発・比較評価しており、形質推定手法が研究の中心である。

Code and data availability

公開論文であることは確認できましたが、現在の公式API・許可済み取得経路では本文を自動取得できませんでした。

No evidence-backed public reproduction asset is currently recorded.