L, rCBD, rCMFL) so that the effects of threshold are comparable between plots with different metric values. Each profile type (Fig. 3) based on a 10 % bulk density threshold is shown separately (color scale). Data availability The package LidarForFuel developed in the context of this study is available on the github repository: https://github.com/oliviermartin7/LidarForFuel. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14261023. References Abdollahi, A., Yebra, M., 2023. Forest fuel type classification: review of remote sensing techniques, constraints and future trends. J. Environ. Manage. 342, 118315. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118315. Alexander, M.E., Cruz, M.G., 2013. Limitations on the accuracy of m
Open resource ↗oliviermartin7/LidarForFuel · 10.5281/zenodo.14261023 · pdf-raw-page:17 lines:1-46Unverified paper record
Unlocking the potential of Airborne LiDAR for direct assessment of fuel bulk density and load distributions for wildfire hazard mapping
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. · 1 Mar 2025 · 10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110341
Abstract
Large-scale mapping of fuel load and fuel vertical distribution is essential for assessing fire danger, setting strategic goals and actions, and determining long-term resource needs. The Airborne LiDAR system can fulfil such goal by accurately capturing the three-dimensional arrangement of vegetation at regional and national scales. We developed a novel method to estimate multiple metrics of fuel load and vertical bulk density distribution for any type of vegetation. The approach uses Beer-Lambert law for inverting the ALS point cloud into vertical plant area density profiles, which are converted into vertical bulk density distribution profiles using species-specific plant traits. The approach is evaluated by comparing ALS-based vegetation profiles and fuel metrics with field-based data from southeastern France, Spain, and Portugal for a range of vegetation types. ALS-based and field-based vertical vegetation profiles were consistent. The range of values of fuel load metrics was also consistent with field data. Good correlations and low bias were attained for simple stratified structure with R² of 0.6, 0.42 and 0.68 and bias of -5 %, -2 % and -3.3 % for canopy base height, canopy fuel load, and canopy bulk density respectively. However, correlations were low for complex vertical structures. The use of species-specific plant traits appeared relevant by lowering the deviation between field and ALS-based values for most species. Our field-independent fuel metric estimation shows comparable performance to results in the literature based on classification approaches trained on field metrics, highlighting the generality of our direct approach. We demonstrated how our approach is more relevant than field data for defining vertical vegetation strata in complex forest structures. We showed an application of the methods by mapping multiple metrics at regional scale (6343 km²) such as canopy base height, fuel strata gap, and canopy and understory fuel loads. Our approach is adequate for feeding next generation models of wildfire risk assessment systems, enhanced by more flexible and accurate fuel data than the existing fuel typologies.
Plant phenotyping relevance
航空LiDAR点群から植生の垂直構造、燃料負荷、バルク密度などの植物・キャノピー形質を推定する手法を開発し、野外データで評価して地域適用しているため、植物フェノタイピング手法が中心である。
abstractWe developed a novel method to estimate multiple metrics of fuel load and vertical bulk density distribution for any type of vegetation.
abstractThe approach uses Beer-Lambert law for inverting the ALS point cloud into vertical plant area density profiles, which are converted into vertical bulk density distribution profiles using species-specific plant traits.
abstractThe approach is evaluated by comparing ALS-based vegetation profiles and fuel metrics with field-based data from southeastern France, Spain, and Portugal for a range of vegetation types.
Code and data availability
The paper's ALS fuel-metric processing workflow is implemented in the authors' R package LidarForFuel, explicitly stated as developed for this study and publicly available on GitHub with a Zenodo DOI. No separate public field-plot or LiDAR dataset deposit by the authors is stated in the supplied blocks (LiDAR sources,e
This is an automatically classified, unverified record. Curator approval is required before any resource enters the Catalog.