← Papers

Unverified paper record

Remotely detected aboveground plant function predicts belowground processes in two prairie diversity experiments

Ecological Monographs · 23 Nov 2021 · 10.1002/ecm.1488

Abstract

Abstract Imaging spectroscopy provides the opportunity to incorporate leaf and canopy optical data into ecological studies, but the extent to which remote sensing of vegetation can enhance the study of belowground processes is not well understood. In terrestrial systems, aboveground and belowground vegetation quantity and quality are coupled, and both influence belowground microbial processes and nutrient cycling. We hypothesized that ecosystem productivity, and the chemical, structural and phylogenetic‐functional composition of plant communities would be detectable with remote sensing and could be used to predict belowground plant and soil processes in two grassland biodiversity experiments: the BioDIV experiment at Cedar Creek Ecosystem Science Reserve in Minnesota and the Wood River Nature Conservancy experiment in Nebraska. We tested whether aboveground vegetation chemistry and productivity, as detected from airborne sensors, predict soil properties, microbial processes and community composition. Imaging spectroscopy data were used to map aboveground biomass, green vegetation cover, functional traits and phylogenetic‐functional community composition of vegetation. We examined the relationships between the image‐derived variables and soil carbon and nitrogen concentration, microbial community composition, biomass and extracellular enzyme activity, and soil processes, including net nitrogen mineralization. In the BioDIV experiment—which has low overall diversity and productivity despite high variation in each—belowground processes were driven mainly by variation in the amount of organic matter inputs to soils. As a consequence, soil respiration, microbial biomass and enzyme activity, and fungal and bacterial composition and diversity were significantly predicted by remotely sensed vegetation cover and biomass. In contrast, at Wood River—where plant diversity and productivity were consistently higher—belowground processes were driven mainly by variation in the quality of aboveground inputs to soils. Consequently, remotely sensed functional, chemical and phylogenetic composition of vegetation predicted belowground extracellular enzyme activity, microbial biomass, and net nitrogen mineralization rates but aboveground biomass (or cover) did not. The contrasting associations between the quantity (productivity) and quality (composition) of aboveground inputs with belowground soil attributes provide a basis for using imaging spectroscopy to understand belowground processes across productivity gradients in grassland systems. However, a mechanistic understanding of how above and belowground components interact among different ecosystems remains critical to extending these results broadly.

Plant phenotyping relevance

航空機イメージング分光法により植物バイオマス、緑色被覆、機能形質、群集組成を抽出し、地下プロセスとの関係を評価しており、植物形質取得が研究の中心的手法である。

abstractImaging spectroscopy data were used to map aboveground biomass, green vegetation cover, functional traits and phylogenetic‐functional community composition of vegetation.
abstractThe contrasting associations between the quantity (productivity) and quality (composition) of aboveground inputs with belowground soil attributes provide a basis for using imaging spectroscopy to understand belowground processes across productivity gradients in grassland systems.

Code and data availability

The paper's Open Research statement deposits its data and novel code (Cavender-Bares et al. 2021) on DRUM (University of Minnesota) under a Creative Commons license, and Cedar Creek LTER data are available at the Cedar Creek data repository. These are paper-specific, public, actionable assets covering the phenotyping/遥

Datasetpublic

Data and novel code (Cavender‐Bares et al. 2021 ) are accessible through a Creative Commons license for non‐commercial use on DRUM, the Data Repository of the University of Minnesota, at https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/220311

Open resource ↗DRUM · 11299/220311 · lines:294-333
Datasetpublic

and at the Cedar Creek Ecosystem Science Reserve Long‐Term Ecological Research data repository: https://www.cedarcreek.umn.edu/research/data

Open resource ↗Cedar Creek Ecosystem Science Reserve Long‐Term Ecological Research data repository · lines:294-333

This is an automatically classified, unverified record. Curator approval is required before any resource enters the Catalog.