at the difference in spatial resolution of the two sensors evaluated, 10 meters per pixel of Sentinel-2 and 65 meters per pixel of Amazônia-1, is not a determining factor in the correct identification of soybean phenological stages. Data Availability All relevant data is available in the GitHub repository at the following link: https://github.com/FSilva-826/DADOS---AMAZONIA1-CENTINEL2 . Funding Statement This study was funded by the College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, RSPD2024R678 (to Mohamed A. El-Tayeb). This study was also funded by a scholarship from CAPES, Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel, 88887.677482/2022-00 (to Airton Andrade
Open resource ↗FSilva-826/DADOS---AMAZONIA1-CENTINEL2 · lines:240-262Unverified paper record
Spectral indices with different spatial resolutions in recognizing soybean phenology.
PloS one · 18 Sept 2024 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0305610
Abstract
The aim of the present research was to evaluate the efficiency of different vegetation indices (VI) obtained from satellites with varying spatial resolutions in discriminating the phenological stages of soybean crops. The experiment was carried out in a soybean cultivation area irrigated by central pivot, in Balsas, MA, Brazil, where weekly assessments of phenology and leaf area index were carried out. Throughout the crop cycle, spectral data from the study area were collected from sensors, onboard the Sentinel-2 and Amazônia-1 satellites. The images obtained were processed to obtain the VI based on NIR (NDVI, NDWI and SAVI) and RGB (VARI, IV GREEN and GLI), for the different phenological stages of the crop. The efficiency in identifying phenological stages by VI was determined through discriminant analysis and the Algorithm Neural Network-ANN, where the best classifications presented an Apparent Error Rate (APER) equal to zero. The APER for the discriminant analysis varied between 53.4% and 70.4% while, for the ANN, it was between 47.4% and 73.9%, making it not possible to identify which of the two analysis techniques is more appropriate. The study results demonstrated that the difference in sensors spatial resolution is not a determining factor in the correct identification of soybean phenological stages. Although no VI, obtained from the Amazônia-1 and Sentinel-2 sensor systems, was 100% effective in identifying all phenological stages, specific indices can be used to identify some key phenological stages of soybean crops, such as: flowering (R1 and R2); pod development (R4); grain development (R5.1); and plant physiological maturity (R8). Therefore, VI obtained from orbital sensors are effective in identifying soybean phenological stages quickly and cheaply.
Plant phenotyping relevance
衛星スペクトル指数と解析手法によりダイズの生育ステージを推定し、空間解像度や分類性能を評価しており、植物フェノタイピング手法の検証・適用が研究の中心です。
abstractThe aim of the present research was to evaluate the efficiency of different vegetation indices (VI) obtained from satellites with varying spatial resolutions in discriminating the phenological stages of soybean crops.
abstractThe efficiency in identifying phenological stages by VI was determined through discriminant analysis and the Algorithm Neural Network-ANN
abstractTherefore, VI obtained from orbital sensors are effective in identifying soybean phenological stages quickly and cheaply.
Code and data availability
The authors state all relevant data (soybean phenology/vegetation index measurements from Sentinel-2 and Amazonia-1) are publicly available in their GitHub repository.
This is an automatically classified, unverified record. Curator approval is required before any resource enters the Catalog.