The datasets and custom R scripts generated and/or analyzed in this study are available in the figshare repository, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.17334407 .
Open resource ↗figshare · 10.6084/m9.figshare.17334407 · lines:120-146Unverified paper record
A comparison of ImageJ and machine learning based image analysis methods to measure cassava bacterial blight disease severity.
Plant methods · 21 Jun 2022 · 10.1186/s13007-022-00906-x
Abstract
Background Methods to accurately quantify disease severity are fundamental to plant pathogen interaction studies. Commonly used methods include visual scoring of disease symptoms, tracking pathogen growth in planta over time, and various assays that detect plant defense responses. Several image-based methods for phenotyping of plant disease symptoms have also been developed. Each of these methods has different advantages and limitations which should be carefully considered when choosing an approach and interpreting the results. Results In this paper, we developed two image analysis methods and tested their ability to quantify different aspects of disease lesions in the cassava-Xanthomonas pathosystem. The first method uses ImageJ, an open-source platform widely used in the biological sciences. The second method is a few-shot support vector machine learning tool that uses a classifier file trained with five representative infected leaf images for lesion recognition. Cassava leaves were syringe infiltrated with wildtype Xanthomonas, a Xanthomonas mutant with decreased virulence, and mock treatments. Digital images of infected leaves were captured overtime using a Raspberry Pi camera. The image analysis methods were analyzed and compared for the ability to segment the lesion from the background and accurately capture and measure differences between the treatment types. Conclusions Both image analysis methods presented in this paper allow for accurate segmentation of disease lesions from the non-infected plant. Specifically, at 4-, 6-, and 9-days post inoculation (DPI), both methods provided quantitative differences in disease symptoms between different treatment types. Thus, either method could be applied to extract information about disease severity. Strengths and weaknesses of each approach are discussed.
Plant phenotyping relevance
カシャバの病斑を画像から分割・定量する2手法を開発し、処理間の病害症状測定能力を比較検証しており、植物表現型取得法が中心である。
abstractIn this paper, we developed two image analysis methods and tested their ability to quantify different aspects of disease lesions in the cassava-Xanthomonas pathosystem.
abstractThe image analysis methods were analyzed and compared for the ability to segment the lesion from the background and accurately capture and measure differences between the treatment types.
Code and data availability
The paper deposits its datasets and custom R scripts on figshare and points to the authors' public PhenotyperCV machine learning workflow on GitHub, both directly supporting this paper's cassava bacterial blight image analysis.
The machine learning workflow and software download instructions are available on GitHub. ( https://github.com/jberry47/ddpsc_phenotypercv/wiki/Machine-Learning-Workflow ).
Open resource ↗github.com/jberry47/ddpsc_phenotypercv · lines:120-146This is an automatically classified, unverified record. Curator approval is required before any resource enters the Catalog.