Unverified paper record
Cabbage plant (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.) quantification culti-vated under different soil covers using aerial photographs
Agro Productividad · 6 Dec 2024 · 10.32854/agrop.v17i11.3117
Abstract
var. capitata L.) quantification cultivated under different types of mulching, using aerial images captured by RPAS (Remotely Piloted Aircraft System). Design/methodology/approach: The cabbage plantation used for the study was established under a completely randomized block design with different types of mulch as treatments: black plastic, white plastic, straw, and bare soil. Manual plant counts and automated estimates were performed using two agricultural artificial intelligence platforms (Platforms A and B). The relationship was evaluated using linear regression correlation (R²), and the following indicators were subsequently used: estimation accuracy (Ps), estimation error percentage (Es), mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean square error (RMSE). Results: Platform A showed a correlation coefficient range of R²=0.41 to 0.91. Platform B obtained R² values ranging from 0.77 to 0.88. Platform A exhibited the highest estimation accuracy (Ps) with 98.3% and an estimation error (Es) of -1.7% for straw mulch, with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.0% and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 1 for bare soil. Both platforms showed underestimations in the number of detected plants, ranging from -6.7% to -1.7%. Limitations on study/implications: The use of RPAS was limited by atmospheric conditions such as wind and rain. Findings/conclusions: The effectiveness of counting cabbage plants using RPAS was validated.
Plant phenotyping relevance
RPAS画像とAIプラットフォームによるキャベツ個体数の自動推定を開発・評価し、手動計数との相関や誤差で検証しているため、植物表現型取得手法が中心である。
abstractManual plant counts and automated estimates were performed using two agricultural artificial intelligence platforms (Platforms A and B).
abstractThe relationship was evaluated using linear regression correlation (R²), and the following indicators were subsequently used: estimation accuracy (Ps), estimation error percentage (Es), mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean square error (RMSE).
abstractThe effectiveness of counting cabbage plants using RPAS was validated.
Code and data availability
公開論文であることは確認できましたが、現在の公式API・許可済み取得経路では本文を自動取得できませんでした。
No evidence-backed public reproduction asset is currently recorded.
This is an automatically classified, unverified record. Curator approval is required before any resource enters the Catalog.