Unverified paper record
Field Phenotyping of Triticale Overwintering Dynamics Under Varied Sowing Practices Using Spectral Indices
Agronomy · 27 Apr 2026 · 10.3390/agronomy16090880
Abstract
This study aims to enhance the early warning and monitoring of frost damage in triticale (×Triticosecale Wittmack), as well as to identify frost-tolerant materials. To this end, this work focused on phenotyping the dynamics of triticale under different damage intensities using spectral indices. Sixteen triticale genotypes were planted under three sowing date (SD) treatments, with three sowing rate (SR) gradients set for each SD. The multispectral data of triticale under six frost damage intensities were acquired using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) platform. A total of eight spectral indices (SIs) were extracted from samples under each intensity. In general, for each combination of SD and SR, all SIs decreased monotonically with increasing damage intensity. These indices are therefore suitable for monitoring frost damage in triticale under complex sowing scenarios. Under early frost damage, the relative decline rates (RDRs) of the SRI (Simple Ratio Vegetation Index), EVI2 (Enhanced Vegetation Index 2), NIRv (Near-Infrared Reflectance of Vegetation), and GLI (Green Leaf Index) were higher than those of other indices, indicating that they are more sensitive to early frost damage and thus more suitable for frost warning. Under frost stress, the RDRs of the indices were higher in early-sown samples than in late-sown samples. SD plays a more significant role than SR in determining the response of triticale indices to frost damage. Models were developed to detect triticale under varying damage intensities with SIs and classification algorithms—XGBoost, Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM). The SVM classifier demonstrated the best generalization performance (overall accuracy: 98.03%; F1-score: 0.98). The detection contributions of indices within the optimal model were evaluated by their respective SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) values. The GLI, NIRv, NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index), and GNDVI (Green Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) were identified as key indices, as they exhibit higher cumulative SHAP values. Identification models for triticale with different frost tolerance levels were established based on the time-series data of these key indices and the above four algorithms. The optimal model based on the SVM algorithm achieved an identification accuracy exceeding 90%. The average overwintering dynamics and frost damage responses of the key indices were analyzed for triticale with different frost tolerance levels under all treatments. Under frost stress, these indices and their RDRs in frost-tolerant triticale were generally higher and lower, respectively, than those in frost-sensitive triticale. These four key indices can thus assist in the identification of frost tolerance in triticale. This study aids in the early warning and monitoring of frost damage in triticale under complex planting scenarios and the evaluation of overwintering performance in triticale germplasm.
Plant phenotyping relevance
UAVマルチスペクトル画像とスペクトル指標を用いて、コムギライムギの凍害強度・耐凍性を推定するモデルを開発・評価しており、植物表現型取得と解析手法が研究の中心である。
abstractThe multispectral data of triticale under six frost damage intensities were acquired using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) platform.
abstractModels were developed to detect triticale under varying damage intensities with SIs and classification algorithms—XGBoost, Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM).
abstractThis study aids in the early warning and monitoring of frost damage in triticale under complex planting scenarios and the evaluation of overwintering performance in triticale germplasm.
Code and data availability
The supplied blocks describe UAV multispectral data collection, spectral index extraction, and ML modeling for triticale frost damage phenotyping, but contain no data availability statement, no deposited phenotype dataset, no public imagery, and no author code/model release. The only URLs mentioned (Pix4D, QGIS, MATLAB
No evidence-backed public reproduction asset is currently recorded.
This is an automatically classified, unverified record. Curator approval is required before any resource enters the Catalog.