Comparative Evaluation of Ground-based, Manual, and Remote Sensing Approaches for Crop Stress Detection: A Review between Malaysia and China

Abstract

This study presents a comparative evaluation of manual inspection, ground-based sensors, and UAV-based remote sensing for detecting crop stress in paddy, maize, and coconut fields across Malaysia and China. Although sensing technologies have advanced considerably, cross-country comparisons between regions with differing levels of technological maturity remain limited. China, recognised for its advanced adoption of UAV and sensor-based agriculture, provides a benchmark against Malaysia’s developing digital agriculture landscape. Each method was assessed based on accuracy, responsiveness, scalability, and cost-effectiveness under field conditions. UAV-based remote sensing achieved the highest overall accuracy (mean 92%) and demonstrated superior scalability, enabling rapid large-area monitoring using vegetation indices such as NDVI and NDRE. Ground-based sensors, including soil moisture probes and chlorophyll meters, showed moderate accuracy (mean 81%) and were suitable for plot-level monitoring with real-time feedback. Manual inspection recorded the lowest accuracy (mean 68%) and limited scalability due to labour dependency and subjective assessment. UAV methods were particularly effective in early stress detection, with thermal imaging identifying canopy temperature anomalies 3–5 days before visible symptoms, especially in maize and coconut fields. Integrating UAV and ground-based sensing provided more comprehensive and timely assessments than individual approaches. These findings support the development of scalable precision agriculture frameworks tailored to tropical and subtropical systems.

Plant phenotyping relevance

作物ストレスという植物状態を対象に、手動観察・地上センサー・UAVリモートセンシングを精度、応答性、拡張性、費用で比較評価しており、センシング手法の技術評価が中心である。

Code and data availability

公開論文であることは確認できましたが、現在の公式API・許可済み取得経路では本文を自動取得できませんでした。

No evidence-backed public reproduction asset is currently recorded.