All primary data to support the findings of this study are openly available in Dryad at https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.pk0p2ngst ( Tejera-Nieves and Walker, 2024 ).
Open resource ↗Dryad · 10.5061/dryad.pk0p2ngst · lines:120-161Unverified paper record
The Dynamic Assimilation Technique measures photosynthetic CO2 response curves with similar fidelity to steady-state approaches in half the time.
Journal of experimental botany · 1 May 2024 · 10.1093/jxb/erae057
Abstract
The net CO2 assimilation (A) response to intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) is a fundamental measurement in photosynthesis and plant physiology research. The conventional A/Ci protocols rely on steady-state measurements and take 15-40 min per measurement, limiting data resolution or biological replication. Additionally, there are several CO2 protocols employed across the literature, without clear consensus as to the optimal protocol or systematic biases in their estimations. We compared the non-steady-state Dynamic Assimilation Technique (DAT) protocol and the three most used CO2 protocols in steady-state measurements, and tested whether different CO2 protocols lead to systematic differences in estimations of the biochemical limitations to photosynthesis. The DAT protocol reduced the measurement time by almost half without compromising estimation accuracy or precision. The monotonic protocol was the fastest steady-state method. Estimations of biochemical limitations to photosynthesis were very consistent across all CO2 protocols, with slight differences in Rubisco carboxylation limitation. The A/Ci curves were not affected by the direction of the change of CO2 concentration but rather the time spent under triose phosphate utilization (TPU)-limited conditions. Our results suggest that the maximum rate of Rubisco carboxylation (Vcmax), linear electron flow for NADPH supply (J), and TPU measured using different protocols within the literature are comparable, or at least not systematically different based on the measurement protocol used.
Plant phenotyping relevance
植物の光合成生理形質を測定するCO2応答プロトコルを比較・検証し、測定時間、精度、再現性を評価しているため、方法検証が中心です。
abstractWe compared the non-steady-state Dynamic Assimilation Technique (DAT) protocol and the three most used CO2 protocols in steady-state measurements
abstractThe DAT protocol reduced the measurement time by almost half without compromising estimation accuracy or precision.
Code and data availability
The paper's primary A/Ci gas-exchange measurement data are openly deposited in Dryad. The msuRACiFit GitHub repository is cited prior work, not this paper's analysis code, and no author analysis code URL is given for this study.
This is an automatically classified, unverified record. Curator approval is required before any resource enters the Catalog.