We use the data previously published by Loldaze et al. [ 21 , 22 ], which is available on the CIMMYT Research Data repository at https://hdl.handle.net/11529/10548898 .
Open resource ↗CIMMYT Research Data repository · 11529/10548898 · lines:35-47Unverified paper record
Comparing statistical 'phenomic prediction' models for remote-sensing-based phenotyping of maize susceptibility to common rust.
Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 5 Nov 2025 · 10.1016/j.plaphe.2025.100134
Abstract
We investigate the potential of phenomic prediction (PP) in remote-sensing-based phenotyping for genetic studies. Rather than relying on a single vegetation index, we utilize all available data collectively to predict the human-assigned visual score (VS). The conceptual motivation is that when a trained model is available, these predictions may provide a more accurate assessment of disease symptoms than the use of a specific vegetation index (VI). To evaluate the PP approach, we employ the predicted VS in a genome-wide association study (GWAS) and consider strength and position of the detected genetic signal. We use two different sets of predictor variables: i) the five basic wavelengths captured by a multispectral and a thermal camera (basic traits model, BT) or ii) all traits (AT), consisting of the five basic wavelengths plus ten vegetation indices. As statistical methods, we compare a) (linear) ordinary least squares regression (OLS), b) (linear) ridge regression (RR), c) (linear) least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) d) an artificial neural network (ANN) and e) a gradient boosted regression tree method (GBRT). Our results indicate that the simple linear OLS regression on the five basic wavelengths (BT-OLS) performs on a level comparable to the best individual vegetation index G. The use of all traits in the OLS regression (AT-OLS) leads to overfitting, which was prevented by the regularization in AT-RR and AT-LASSO. The non-linear ANN approach seems to improve the results further, but the differences between the methods were not statistically significant. The strongest improvement for the purification of the genetic signal was observed when genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) for the different traits (VS, basic wavelengths, vegetation indices) instead of their adjusted phenotypes were used. Across all approaches, the combination of GEBVs with Ridge Regression or the non-linear ANN provided the best results.
Plant phenotyping relevance
リモートセンシング画像・センサーデータからトウモロコシさび病の視覚的症状スコアを推定する複数の統計・機械学習手法を比較評価しており、表現型取得・抽出法が研究の中心である。
abstractWe investigate the potential of phenomic prediction (PP) in remote-sensing-based phenotyping for genetic studies.
abstractTo evaluate the PP approach, we employ the predicted VS in a genome-wide association study (GWAS) and consider strength and position of the detected genetic signal.
abstractAs statistical methods, we compare a) (linear) ordinary least squares regression (OLS), b) (linear) ridge regression (RR), c) (linear) least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) d) an artificial neural network (ANN) and e) a gradient boosted regression tree method (GBRT).
Code and data availability
The paper's phenotypic (visual scores, adjusted phenotypes) and remote-sensing (multispectral/thermal) data, plus genomic marker data, are publicly deposited in the CIMMYT Research Data repository. No authors' analysis code or trained model checkpoints are deposited; R packages cited are generic libraries.
This is an automatically classified, unverified record. Curator approval is required before any resource enters the Catalog.