← Papers

Unverified paper record

A Two-Step Machine Learning Approach for Crop Disease Detection Using GAN and UAV Technology

Remote Sensing · 23 Sept 2022 · 10.3390/rs14194765

Abstract

Automated plant diagnosis is a technology that promises large increases in cost-efficiency for agriculture. However, multiple problems reduce the effectiveness of drones, including the inverse relationship between resolution and speed and the lack of adequate labeled training data. This paper presents a two-step machine learning approach that analyzes low-fidelity and high-fidelity images in sequence, preserving efficiency as well as accuracy. Two data-generators are also used to minimize class imbalance in the high-fidelity dataset and to produce low-fidelity data that are representative of UAV images. The analysis of applications and methods is conducted on a database of high-fidelity apple tree images which are corrupted with class imbalance. The application begins by generating high-fidelity data using generative networks and then uses these novel data alongside the original high-fidelity data to produce low-fidelity images. A machine learning identifier identifies plants and labels them as potentially diseased or not. A machine learning classifier is then given the potentially diseased plant images and returns actual diagnoses for these plants. The results show an accuracy of 96.3% for the high-fidelity system and a 75.5% confidence level for our low-fidelity system. Our drone technology shows promising results in accuracy when compared to labor-based methods of diagnosis.

Plant phenotyping relevance

UAV画像と機械学習、GANを組み合わせ、植物画像から病害状態を推定する二段階手法が研究の中心であり、精度評価も実施しているため。

abstractThis paper presents a two-step machine learning approach that analyzes low-fidelity and high-fidelity images in sequence, preserving efficiency as well as accuracy.
abstractA machine learning identifier identifies plants and labels them as potentially diseased or not. A machine learning classifier is then given the potentially diseased plant images and returns actual diagnoses for these plants.
abstractThe results show an accuracy of 96.3% for the high-fidelity system and a 75.5% confidence level for our low-fidelity system.

Code and data availability

The paper's experiments were conducted on the Plant Pathology 2020 dataset, and the authors explicitly point to its public Kaggle URL in the Data Availability Statement. No author analysis code, models, or generated synthetic data are stated to be publicly available.

Datasetpublic

.D.B.; validation, Mathew Horak and W.D.B.; visualization, A.P. and N.M.; writing—original draft, A.P., N.M., M.H. and W.D.B.; writing—review and editing, M.H. and W.D.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: This research received no external funding. Data Availability Statement: https://www.kaggle.com/c/plant-pathology-2020-fgvc7 (accessed on 8 August 2022). Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. References 1. FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: International Plant Protection Convention. Available online: https://www.fao.org/plant-health-2020/about/en (accessed on 17 September 2022). 2. B

Open resource ↗Kaggle · plant-pathology-2020-fgvc7 · pdf-raw-page:12 lines:1-52

This is an automatically classified, unverified record. Curator approval is required before any resource enters the Catalog.