Unverified paper record
Machine Vision–Based Deep Learning for Automated Crop Disease Classification in Precision Agriculture Article
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · 5 Mar 2026 · 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8761764/v1
Abstract
Abstract Cherry is widely cultivated but remains challenging to harvest due to economic and ecological constraints, especially in developing countries such as Pakistan. Climate change, limited use of technology, and foliar diseases worsened by pesticide use further reduce productivity, particularly during fruiting. Conventional disease assessment depends on expert observation and grower experience, making it subjective and time-consuming. A comprehensive evaluation was conducted on the PlantCity dataset, which contains 5,714 high-density, full-color RGB images collected under challenging conditions and categorized into 5 classes. We compared three approaches: deep learning pre-trained, transfer learning, and a machine learning pipeline. Models were evaluated by accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, Cohen’s Kappa, inference time, FLOPs, and throughput. Grad-CAM was used to improve interpretability. Transfer learning using DenseNet169 achieved the highest performance, with 99.80% accuracy, 99.80% precision, 99.80% recall, and a Cohen’s Kappa of 99.74%. These results were significantly higher than those obtained by other deep learning architectures and handcrafted baselines. Grad-CAM heatmaps confirmed that the models focused their attention on pathological areas. The proposed transfer-learning-based framework, particularly DenseNet169, demonstrates state-of-the-art diagnostic accuracy and features a modular structure. This design enables deployment on both high-performance servers and resource-constrained embedded devices, thereby facilitating early disease detection in precision agriculture.
Plant phenotyping relevance
植物画像から病害状態を分類する画像ベース表現型推定が研究の中心であり、複数モデルの比較・性能評価とGrad-CAMによる検証を行っているため。
abstractConventional disease assessment depends on expert observation and grower experience, making it subjective and time-consuming.
abstractWe compared three approaches: deep learning pre-trained, transfer learning, and a machine learning pipeline. Models were evaluated by accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, Cohen’s Kappa, inference time, FLOPs, and throughput.
abstractGrad-CAM heatmaps confirmed that the models focused their attention on pathological areas.
Code and data availability
植物フェノタイピング解析を再現する公開資産であることを、入力本文と直接リンクから確認できなかったため保留しました。
No evidence-backed public reproduction asset is currently recorded.
This is an automatically classified, unverified record. Curator approval is required before any resource enters the Catalog.