← Papers

Unverified paper record

The Fallacy and Bias of Averages on Vegetation Indices based Plant Phenotyping

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 15 Oct 2025 · 10.1101/2025.10.14.682309

Abstract

Abstract Background Vegetation indices (VIs) from remote sensing are widely used for non-destructive plant phenotyping, often averaged across plots or image regions to represent each plot. However, according to Jensen’s inequality, which is known as the “fallacy of the average”, it can bias estimates when nonlinear relationships exist between VIs and target traits. To examine this issue, we systematically assessed the severity of this bias and tested a correction method. VI values were simulated using six beta distributions with varying shapes and skewness, and with normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) images from a paddy rice experiment to evaluate bias under real conditions. Nonlinear link functions (concave, convex, logistic) with different noise levels were applied to model VI–trait relationships. Result The results showed that averaging under nonlinear relationships reduced predictive performance, lowering the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) between true and predicted traits by up to 82%. In the rice NDVI simulation, R 2 was reduced by up to 58% around the tillering stage. Our correction method, which predicts traits from VI before averaging, substantially mitigated bias, improving R 2 by up to 0.68 depending on noise level, VI distribution, and link function. To facilitate application, we established an interactive R Shiny website enabling users to quantify potential biases and the efficacy of corrections within this workflow based on their own research conditions Conclusion In summary, averaging VIs without accounting for nonlinear relationships can introduce substantial bias and degrade phenotyping accuracy. This bias should be explicitly considered in phenotyping analyses, and correction methods applied when appropriate to improve reliability.

Plant phenotyping relevance

植物フェノタイピングにおける植生指数の平均化バイアスを検証し、補正法と適用支援ツールを開発しており、形質推定手法が研究の中心である。

abstractTo examine this issue, we systematically assessed the severity of this bias and tested a correction method.
abstractOur correction method, which predicts traits from VI before averaging, substantially mitigated bias
abstractwe established an interactive R Shiny website enabling users to quantify potential biases and the efficacy of corrections within this workflow

Code and data availability

植物フェノタイピング解析を再現する公開資産であることを、入力本文と直接リンクから確認できなかったため保留しました。

No evidence-backed public reproduction asset is currently recorded.

This is an automatically classified, unverified record. Curator approval is required before any resource enters the Catalog.