Chinna Gopi Simhadri: Formal analysis, investigation, resources, data collection, writing an original draft, Review & editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Data availability In this work, the publicly available dataset was used. The data set is available through the link to Kaggle https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/dedeikhsandwisaputra/rice-leafs-disease-dataset. Code availability The code developed and used in this study has been uploaded and is available on GitHub and MATLAB File Exchange. These repositories include all the necessary scripts, tools, and instructions required to replicate the results presented in this work. The repository can be
Open resource ↗Kaggle · dedeikhsandwisaputra/rice-leafs-disease-dataset · lines:1332-1347Unverified paper record
Evaluation of deep learning models using explainable AI with qualitative and quantitative analysis for rice leaf disease detection.
Scientific reports · 29 Aug 2025 · 10.1038/s41598-025-14306-3
Abstract
Deep learning models have shown remarkable success in disease detection and classification tasks, but lack transparency in their decision-making process, creating reliability and trust issues. Although traditional evaluation methods focus entirely on performance metrics such as classification accuracy, precision and recall, they fail to assess whether the models are considering relevant features for decision-making. The main objective of this work is to develop and validate a comprehensive three-stage methodology that combines conventional performance evaluation with qualitative and quantitative evaluation of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) visualizations to assess both the accuracy and reliability of deep learning models. Eight pre-trained deep learning models - ResNet50, InceptionResNetV2, DenseNet 201, InceptionV3, EfficientNetB0, Xception, VGG16 and AlexNet,were evaluated using a three-stage methodology. First, the models are assessed using traditional classification metrics. Second, Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) is employed to visualize and quantitatively evaluate feature selection using metrics such as Intersection over Union (IoU) and the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC). Third, a novel overfitting ratio metric is introduced to quantify the reliance of the models on insignificant features. In the experimental analysis, ResNet50 emerged as the most accurate model, achieving 99.13% classification accuracy as well as the most reliable model demonstrating superior feature selection capabilities (IoU: 0.432, overfitting ratio: 0.284). Despite the high classification accuracies, models such as InceptionV3 and EfficientNetB0 showed poor feature selection capabilities with low IoU scores (0.295 and 0.326) and high overfitting ratios (0.544 and 0.458), indicating potential reliability issues in real-world applications. This study introduces a novel quantitative methodology for evaluating deep learning models that goes beyond traditional accuracy metrics, enabling more reliable and trustworthy AI systems for agricultural applications. This methodology is generic and researchers can explore the possibilities of extending it to other domains that require transparent and interpretable AI systems.
Plant phenotyping relevance
イネ葉の病徴を画像から検出・分類する深層学習モデルについて、性能と説明可能性を評価する三段階の方法論を開発・検証しており、植物病害状態のフェノタイピング手法が中心である。
abstractThe main objective of this work is to develop and validate a comprehensive three-stage methodology that combines conventional performance evaluation with qualitative and quantitative evaluation of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) visualizations to assess both the accuracy and reliability of deep learning models.
abstractLocal Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) is employed to visualize and quantitatively evaluate feature selection using metrics such as Intersection over Union (IoU) and the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC).
Code and data availability
The paper uses the public Kaggle rice leaf disease dataset and explicitly states that the authors' analysis code is publicly available on GitHub and MATLAB File Exchange via short URLs, both of which are in the allowed URL list.
ode availability The code developed and used in this study has been uploaded and is available on GitHub and MATLAB File Exchange. These repositories include all the necessary scripts, tools, and instructions required to replicate the results presented in this work. The repository can be accessed via the following links: Github: https://shorturl.at/Github_Quant_XAI MATLAB File Exchange link: https://shorturl.at/MATLAB_Quant_XAI Declarations Competing interests
Open resource ↗GitHub · lines:1332-1347This is an automatically classified, unverified record. Curator approval is required before any resource enters the Catalog.