← Papers

Unverified paper record

Leveraging multiple datasets for deep leaf counting

bioRxiv · 6 Sept 2017 · 10.1101/185173

Abstract

The number of leaves a plant has is one of the key traits (phenotypes) describing its development and growth. Here, we propose an automated, deep learning based approach for counting leaves in model rosette plants. While state-of-the-art results on leaf counting with deep learning methods have recently been reported, they obtain the count as a result of leaf segmentation and thus require per-leaf (instance) segmentation to train the models (a rather strong annotation). Instead, our method treats leaf counting as a direct regression problem and thus only requires as annotation the total leaf count per plant. We argue that combining different datasets when training a deep neural network is beneficial and improves the results of the proposed approach. We evaluate our method on the CVPPP 2017 Leaf Counting Challenge dataset, which contains images of Arabidopsis and tobacco plants. Experimental results show that the proposed method significantly outperforms the winner of the previous CVPPP challenge, improving the results by a minimum of 50% on each of the test datasets, and can achieve this performance without knowing the experimental origin of the data (i.e. \"in the wild\" setting of the challenge). We also compare the counting accuracy of our model with that of per leaf segmentation algorithms, achieving a 20% decrease in mean absolute difference in count (|DiC|).

Plant phenotyping relevance

植物画像から葉数という形態形質を推定する深層学習手法を開発し、既存手法・ベンチマークデータセットで性能評価しており、表現型取得・抽出法が研究の中心である。

abstractHere, we propose an automated, deep learning based approach for counting leaves in model rosette plants.
abstractInstead, our method treats leaf counting as a direct regression problem and thus only requires as annotation the total leaf count per plant.
abstractWe evaluate our method on the CVPPP 2017 Leaf Counting Challenge dataset

Code and data availability

The paper uses the CVPPP 2017 LCC datasets (A1-A5) and a modified ResNet50, but no block contains an authors' public code/model/data release URL or availability statement; allowed_urls is empty, so no qualifying paper-specific public asset can be cited.

No evidence-backed public reproduction asset is currently recorded.

This is an automatically classified, unverified record. Curator approval is required before any resource enters the Catalog.